EFL Students’ Experiences and Perceptions of Using Chatgpt for Brainstorming in Research Proposal Writing

Nurul Hafizatul Isnaini, Darmawan Darmawan, Sukmawati Sadilia, Erniwati Erniwati

Abstract


This study aimed to explore English Education students’ experiences and perceptions of using ChatGPT during the brainstorming stage of research proposal writing at Tadulako University. While previous research has examined the use of artificial intelligence in academic writing more broadly, limited attention has been given to its role in brainstorming research ideas. Using a qualitative case study design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 12 students and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis. The findings revealed five main themes: challenges in brainstorming, ChatGPT as academic support, perceived relational value, developing strategic AI use, and recognizing limitations. Participants reported that ChatGPT helped them generate, develop, and organize research ideas, which increased their confidence and facilitated the proposal writing process. However, they also emphasized the importance of verifying AI-generated information, critically evaluating its responses, and maintaining intellectual autonomy because of concerns about accuracy and reliability. Overall, the findings indicate that ChatGPT can serve as an effective brainstorming support tool for research proposal writing when its use is accompanied by critical thinking, careful verification, and responsible AI practices.


Keywords


Chatgpt; Brainstorming; Research Proposal Writing; Students’ Experiences; Students’ Perceptions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alberth. (2024). ChatGPT and the Future of English Language Teaching and Learning.

Amri, S., & Salmiati, S. (2024). Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Introduction of Research Proposal: Difficulties and Solutions. English Journal of Indragiri, 8(2), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.61672/eji.v8i2.2822

Apriani, E., Cardoso, L., Obaid, A. J., Muthmainnah, M., Wijayanti, E., Esmianti, F., & Supardan, D. (2024). Impact of AI-powered chatbots on EFL students’ writing skills, self-efficacy, and self-regulation: a mixed-methods study. Global Educational Research Review, 1(2), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.71380/GERR-08-2024-8

Ariqo, W., Rizal, E., & Winoto, Y. (2025). Analisis Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan ChatGPT dalam Penulisan Karya Publikasi Ilmiah: Manfaat dan Tantangan. Literatify, 6(1).

Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities and Challenges.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chukwuere. (2024). ChatGPT in Academic Writing.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Deng, J. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Academic Writing.

Díaz Larenas, C., Ortiz Navarrete, M., Tagle Ochoa, T., Gómez Paniagua, J. F., Quintana Lara, M., Ramos Leiva, L., & Acevedo Rivera, R. (2025). Exploring Preservice Teachers’ Perceived Emotions, Professional Accountability, and Action-Taking Dispositions Towards Language Assessment Scenarios. Education Sciences, 15(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010074

Doğan, Y., & Batdı, V. (2021). Revisiting Brainstorming Within an Educational Context: A Meta-Thematic Analysis. 8(3), 541–556.

Fadli Alghifari, M., & Rosnija, E. (2025). Undergraduate Students’ Perception On Using ChatGPT For Idea Development In Academic Writing Based On TAM: A Descriptive Study.

Fauzan, U., Hasanah, N., & Hadijah, S. (2022). The Undergraduate Students’ Difficulties in Writing Thesis Proposal. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 7(1), 175. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v7i1.515

Feng Teng, M. (2025). Metacognitive Awareness and EFL Learners’ Perceptions and Experiences in Utilising ChatGPT for Writing Feedback. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12811

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Gkintoni, E., Antonopoulou, H., Sortwell, A., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Challenging Cognitive Load Theory: The Role of Educational Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence in Redefining Learning Efficacy. Brain Sciences, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020203

Godoy, D. (2026). AI mediated scaffolding for second language academic writing in EFL composition classrooms. Discover Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01386-0

Hamdani, M. H., & Abid, N. (2025). Indonesian Efl Students’ Writing Challenges: a Qualitative Meta-Analysis. Getsempena English Education Journal, 12(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v12i1.3091

Hamedi, W. H. W., Ali, F. D. A., Abdullah, W. Y., Ab Hamid, H., Shuhaimi, N. ’Izzah M., & Amir, M. M. (2025). AI as a Digital Scaffold: An Integrative Review Of Vygotsky’s Zone Of Proximal Development In Modern Education. International Journal of Modern Education, 7(26), 579–589. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijmoe.726038

Herda, R. K., Travero, A. S., Kafabih, A., Koeswoyo, A. W., Sari, R. N., Hakiki, F. I., & Wahidah, N. (2024). Opportunities Of Using ChatGPT in Academic Writing: Perceptions Of The Philippines And Indonesian Students. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan, 11(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.25157/jwp.v11i2.14922

Huang, J., & Tan, M. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. American Journal of Cancer Research, 13(4).

Hyland, K. (2019). Second Language Writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Jarvis, P. (2006). Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Human Learning: Lifelong Learning and the Learning Society, Volume I.

Li, C., Cui, H., & Hagedorn, L. S. (2026). The cognitive impact of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic review of critical and creative thinking outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100571

Liu, L. (2023). Learning experience and interaction with the learning environment.

Mahapatra. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing.

Mali, Y. C. G. (2023). EFL Students’ Challenges in Writing Research Proposals. LLT Journal: Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(1), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.5296

Meyer, M. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence and Academic Writing.

Mursidin, M., & Nurjannah, S. (2026). From Data to Claim: Understanding the Warrant Deficit in Indonesian Undergraduate Academic Writing. E-Journal of ELTS (English Language Teaching Society), 14(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.22487/elts.v14i1.6323

Nasho Ah-Pine, E., & Awuye, I. S. (2025). Exploring the Trustworthiness of ChatGPT: How Students Perceive AI Reliability in a Business School Context. Journal of International Education in Business. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-09-2024-0123

Nguyen, Q. N., & Doan, D. T. H. (2025). ChatGPT’s Effects on EFL Learners’ Autonomy and Self-Efficacy in Self-Regulated Learning Contexts. JALT CALL Journal, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v21n2.102968

Oates, A., & Johnson, D. (2025). ChatGPT in the Classroom: Evaluating Its Role in Fostering Critical Evaluation Skills. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35(4), 1793–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00452-8

Osborn, A. F. (1954). Creative Thinking. American Association of Industrial Nurses Journal, 6(9), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/216507995800600906

Perkins, M., Roe, J., Postma, D., McGaughran, J., & Hickerson, D. (2023). Detection of GPT-4 Generated Text in Higher Education: Combining Academic Judgement and Software to Identify Generative AI Tool Misuse. Journal of Academic Ethics, 22, 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09492-6

Prasetyaningrum, A., Wati, L., Siti, S. A., & Asrobi, M. (2021). EFL Obstacles in Writing Thesis Proposal. EFJ, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24905/efj.v4i2.102

Pratama, H. (2025). Training Students to Identify and Correct Fabricated References in ChatGPT-Generated Literature Reviews. Conference on English Language Teaching, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.24090/celti.2025.1335

Rahmawati, Zulhipri, O, H., I, F., & D, I. (2022). STUDENTS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN CHEMISTRY LEARNING USING PHET INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS. Journal of Technology and Science Education.

Rasmin, L. O., Hikmawati, & Kaif, S. R. (2026). EFL Students’ Experiences of AI-Assisted Reading in Developing Vocabulary Knowledge: A Qualitative Study. E-Journal of ELTS (English Language Teaching Society), 14(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.22487/elts.v14i1.6318

Rogoff, B. (2023). Mutually Constituting, Fractal: Individual and Cultural Aspects of Holistic Process. Review of Research in Education, 47(1), 60–83. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X231224666

Strzelecki, A., Cicha, K., Rizun, M., & Rutecka, P. (2024). Acceptance and Use of ChatGPT in the Academic Community. Education and Information Technologies, 29(17), 22943–22968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12765-1

Sudrajad, W., Fikri, M. H., & Putra, R. P. B. (2024). Help Me ChatGPT! What Ways Does ChatGPT Influence Students’ Productivity And Creativity In English Academic Writing? Educatum: Scientific Journal of Education, 2(2), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.59165/educatum.v2i2.65

Sunra, L., Irawan, A. M., Asrifan, A., & Sadhasivam, S. (2026). Generative AI in Academic Writing: Student Reflections on Using ChatGPT for Thesis Proposal Development. Studies in English Language and Education, 13(2), 691–709. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v13i2.1073

Teng, M. F. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. In Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2023). Fabrication and Errors in the Bibliographic Citations Generated by ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5

Wang, C. (2024). Exploring Students’ Generative AI-Assisted Writing Processes: Perceptions and Experiences from Native and Nonnative English Speakers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3

Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, S. (2024). Generative AI in Higher Education: Seeing ChatGPT Through Universities’ Policies, Resources, and Guidelines.

Werdiningsih, I., & Marzuki. (2024). Balancing AI and Authenticity: EFL Students’ Experiences with ChatGPT in Academic Writing. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2392388. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2392388

Yasmine, Y. S., & Hikmawan, R. (2025). ChatGPT sebagai Alat Bantu dalam Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Mahasiswa: Analisis Keterlibatan dan Kreativitas. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika, 9(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.29408/edumatic.v9i1.29496

Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner : An Overview Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner : An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i4.3177

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Nurul Hafizatul Isnaini, Darmawan Darmawan, Sukmawati Sadilia, Erniwati Erniwati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.