Idiolect in Digital Communication: A Sociolinguistic Study of the Instagram Account @adindafala
Abstract
This study examines the forms and functions of idiolect on the Instagram account Instagram @adindafala from a sociolinguistic perspective. The focus of the study is directed toward the use of distinctive language that reflects the speaker’s identity in digital communication. This research employs a qualitative descriptive method, with data sources consisting of captions and stories posted on the Instagram account @adindafala. The data were collected through observation and documentation techniques, then analyzed by identifying the forms of idiolect and the language functions used by the speaker. The results of the study indicate that the idiolect found on the Instagram account @adindafala is manifested through the use of code-mixing, phonological changes, regional language interference, slang, abbreviations, language play, and graphological variations. These forms demonstrate a tendency toward the use of creative and communicative nonstandard language in social media. In addition, personal and representational functions were identified in the speaker’s language use. The personal function is reflected through the use of humorous, expressive, casual, and nonstandard language to describe the speaker’s daily experiences, while the representational function is used to convey information related to the speaker’s activities and situations. The findings of this study show that idiolect on social media serves as a form of linguistic expression influenced by digital communication culture and interlanguage interaction.
Keywords
References
Agatha, S., & Iryana, A. (2024, September). Analysis Of Language Variation In Generation Z Social Media Texts With Sociolinguistic Studies. In International Conference on Learning Community (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 2607-2612).
Alwasilah, A, C. 1993. Linguistik Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Angkasa.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). “Computer-Mediated Communication and Linguistic Landscapes.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(3), 321–347.
Anggara, P. P. (2024). Variasi Bahasa Idiolek Pada Tuturan Konten Kreator Youtube Ciduk Warrior: Kajian Sosiolinguistik. Metamorfosis: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Pengajarannya, 17(1), 25-30.
Bahtiar, A., & Irfan, M. (2023). Variasi Idiolek Bahasa Sasak Desa Pengadangan. Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran, 3(3), 675-688.
Chaer, A. 2012. Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (2014). Sosiolinguistik: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Danet, B & Susan, H. 2007. The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Febryanti, L. P. M., & Suparwa, I. N. (2025, May). Metatesis dalam Bahasa Gaul Bahasa Indonesia. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bahasa Ibu (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 944-951).
Fitriani, D. E., Pertila, D. M., & Rahmawanti, I. (2025). Idiolek dan Gaya Bahasa Fiersa Besari di Youtube Atap Negeri. Lingua Susastra, 6(2), 210-218.
Fitriah, S., Putri, A., Triandana, A., Putra, Y., & Amri, U. (2026). Positive Discourse Structure in Joko Widodo`s Speech at the Bloomberg New Economy Forum in Singapore. Education and Linguistics Knowledge Journal, 8(1), 31-46. doi:10.32503/edulink.v8i1.8765
Holmes, J. (2013). Sociolinguistics (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
Kridalaksana, H. 2008. Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muslich, M. (2013). Fonologi Bahasa Indonesia Tinjauan Deskriptif Sistem Bunyi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Nababan, P.W.J. 1993. Sosiolinguistik: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Page, R. (2012). Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. London: Routledge.
Putri, A. (2024). “Pendekatan Kualitatif dalam Kajian Variasi Bahasa Media Sosial.” Jurnal Linguistik Terapan, 9(1), 55–67.
Rohmah, M. N., & Purwanto, J. (2026). Analisis Idiolek dan Sosiolek pada Akun Media Sosial X @leo_edw dalam Wacana sehari-hari. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 3(1), 147-156.
Rokhman, F. (2013). Pengantar Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Romaine, S. (2000). Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rosyianti, K. N., Herdiana, R., & Hidayatullah, A. (2025). Idiolek dalam Tuturan Calon Presiden Tahun 2024 pada Konten Media Sosial TikTok. Diksatrasia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(1), 1-7.
Sembiring, M. E. B., Hutabarat, S., Sinaga, D. A. C., & Wulan, E. P. S. (2025). Variasi Bahasa dalam Komunikasi Digital: Studi Sosiolinguistik pada Platform Media Sosial. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Naratif, 6(1).
Sugianto, A. (2022). Javenglish: Permainan Bahasa di Era Masyarakat Multilingual. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 11(1), 103-110.
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action. London: Routledge.
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer Mediated Communication: Social Interaction and the Internet. London: Sage Publications.
Wardhaugh, R. (2015). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (7th ed.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i4.2605
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Anggi Triandana, Siti Fitriah, Aprilia Kartika Putri, Yoga Mestika Putra, Ulil Amri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


