Pros and Cons of Nickel Mining in Raja Ampat: A Critical Discourse Analysis Based on Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL)
Abstract
Nickel mining in Raja Ampat, West Papua, has sparked intense debate among the government, corporations, indigenous communities, and environmental activists. This article analyzes the pro- and anti-mining discourse through the lens of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), focusing on three language metafunctions: ideational, interpersonal, and textual. Data was extracted from a YouTube video transcript by Kompas TV (June 9, 2025), featuring perspectives from a minister, a parliament member, an activist, and a musician. The findings reveal how social actors construct reality, power relations, and legitimacy through linguistic choices, including modality, transitivity, and lexical cohesion. These findings highlight power dynamics and unequal access in environmental decision-making
Keywords
Systemic Functional Linguistics;nickel mining;Raja Ampat;environmental discourse;transitivity analysis
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research.
Escobar, A. (2006). Ecological Politics and the Making of Nature.
Greenpeace Indonesia. (2025). Report on Nickel Mining Damage in Raja Ampat.
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By.
Susilo, R. (2022). SFL in Environmental Discourse: A Kalimantan Case Study.
Law No. 3 of 2020 on Minerals and Coal.
CrowdTangle. (2024). Indonesia Environmental Hashtag Report.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i5.1077
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dini Putriani Wahyuni, Deuis Sugaryamah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


